During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
In the video that has racked up over 245,000 likes and thousands of comments, Witherspoon explained that the young woman she spoke with is unhappy in her job and looking to career pivot, but when she asked, “What are your talents?” There was a long pause. And that, Witherspoon said, is a huge red flag.
。业内人士推荐heLLoword翻译官方下载作为进阶阅读
687 OPR_R - PROTUN TST_DES_SIMPLE PTOVRR UNL ; validate descriptor
Что думаешь? Оцени!
甚至有网友留言“请删除这条消息，我们为你高兴，但我无法接受”。